|
|
Research Reports:
"Health Survey of Residents Living Near Farm Fields Permitted to Receive
Biosolids,
Sadik Khuder, PhD; Sheryl A. Milz, PhD; Michael Bisesi, PhD; Robert Vincent,
PhD; Wendy McNulty, MS; Kevin Czajkowski, PhD, Archives of Environmental &
Occupational Health, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2007.
Abstract: The authors studied the
health status of residents living in Wood County, OH, near farm fields that were
permitted to receive biosolids. They mailed a health survey to 607 households
and received completed surveys from 437 people exposed to biosolids (living on
or within 1 mile of the fields where application was permitted) and from 176
people not exposed to biosolids (living more than 1 mile from the fields where
application was permitted). The authors allowed for up to 6 surveys per
household. Results revealed that some reported health-related symptoms were
statistically significantly elevated among the exposed residents, including
excessive secretion of tears, abdominal bloating, jaundice, skin ulcer,
dehydration, weight loss, and general weakness. The frequency of reported
occurrence of bronchitis, upper respiratory infection, and giardiasis were also
statistically significantly elevated. The findings suggest an increased risk for
certain respiratory, gastrointestinal, and other diseases among residents living
near farm fields on which the use of biosolids was permitted. However, further
studies are needed to address the limitations cited in this study. (Click here for
article)
"Organizations Respond Quickly to Evidence of Coliform Reactivation,
Steve Spicer, WE&T, Dec. 2006.
Summary: According to a recent Water
Environment Research Foundation (WERF; Alexandria, Va.) study, fecal coliform
counts can increase dramatically in anaerobically digested biosolids, but the
reason is unclear.
Commentary: Waste industry study
shows significant pathogen regrowth in treated sewage sludge . . . . let's not
forget, US EPA ALLOWS 2 million colony forming units of fecal coliform per gram
of total solids , dry weight, in land applied Class B sewage sludge "biosolids"
. . . . on the other hand, Class A sludge is supposed to have pathogens
"below detectable levels" . . . and the waste industry and US EPA
promote Class A sludge "biosolids" as being "virtually
pathogen-free" . (Click here for
article)
"Human Health Risk Evaluation of Land Application of Sewage Sludge/Biosolids",
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch NC Health Department NC,
November 2005.
Commentary: The NC DHHS, Division of
Public Health, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch presented the
NC Division of Water Quality with a
paper prepared and reviewed by all divisions of NC government on December
29, 2005. None of the recommendations or considerations were included in the new
land application regulations called the 2T in 2006. In fact, all recommendations
were "blown off," in a letter
by DWQ and given very little discussion or review. (Added 4/27/2008)
"The Dirty Work of Promoting “Recycling” of America’s Sewage
Sludge, CAROLINE SNYDER, PHD, Oct/Dec 2005.
Abstract: Serious illnesses, including
deaths, and adverse environmental impacts have been linked to land application
of sewage sludge. EPA and the wastewater treatment industry have worked with
Congress to fund wastewater trade associations to promote land application,
supporting industry-friendly scientists and discouraging independent research,
to prevent local governments from restricting land application and to thwart
litigation against municipalities and the industry.
Published INT
J OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 2005;11:415–427 (Click here for reprint)
"Endotoxin Exposure and Symptoms in Wastewater Treatment Workers",Lidwien
A.M. Smit, MSc, Suzanne Spaan, MSc, and Dick Heederik, March 2005
Background Wastewater treatment
workers can be exposed to biological and chemical agents resulting in
work-related health effects. The aim of this study was to investigate
work-related symptoms in these workers. Methods Questionnaire data of 468
employees from 67 sewage treatment plants is evaluated. Personal endotoxin
exposure (8 hr measurements; n¼460) was measured in a sample of workers in
three different periods over 1 year.
Results: Endotoxin exposure ranged from 0.6 to 2093 endotoxin units (EU)/m3,
the geometric mean exposure was low (27 EU/m3). Factor analysis yielded three
clusters of correlated symptoms: ‘‘lower respiratory and skin symptoms,’’
‘‘flu-like and systemic symptoms,’’ and ‘‘upper respiratory
symptoms.’’ Symptoms appeared to be more prevalent in workers exposed to
endotoxin levels higher than 50 EU/m3. A significant dose-response relationship
was found for ‘‘lower respiratory and skin symptoms’’ and ‘‘flu-like
and systemic symptoms’’ (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Wastewater treatment workers reported a wide range of
symptoms that may be work-related. Microbial exposures such as endotoxin seem to
play a causal role.
Published AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL
MEDICINE 48:30–39 (2005)
Posted Sept 6, 2005 (Click here for reprint)
"Biosolid Colloid-Mediated Transport of Copper, Zinc, and Lead in
Waste-Amended Soils", A. D. Karathanasis*, D. M. C. Johnson and C. J.
Matocha, Journal of Environmental Quality, August, 2005
Abstract: Increasing land applications of
biosolid wastes as soil amendments have raised concerns about potential toxic
effects of associated metals on the environment. This study investigated the
ability of biosolid colloids to transport metals associated with organic waste
amendments through subsurface soil environments with leaching experiments
involving undisturbed soil monoliths. Biosolid colloids were fractionated from a
lime-stabilized, an aerobically digested, and a poultry manure organic waste and
applied onto the monoliths at a rate of 0.7 cm/h. Eluents were monitored for Cu,
Zn, Pb, and colloid concentrations over 16 to 24 pore volumes of leaching.
Mass-balance calculations indicated significantly higher (up to 77 times) metal
elutions in association with the biosolid colloids in both total and soluble
fractions over the control treatments. Eluted metal loads varied with metal,
colloid, and soil type, following the sequences Zn = Cu > Pb, and ADB >
PMB > LSB colloids. Colloid and metal elution was enhanced by decreasing pH
and colloid size, and increasing soil macroporosity and organic matter content.
Breakthrough curves were mostly irregular, showing several maxima and minima as
a result of preferential macropore flow and multiple clogging and flushing
cycles. Soil- and colloid-metal sorption affinities were not reliable predictors
of metal attenuation/elution loads, underscoring the dynamic nature of transport
processes. The findings demonstrate the important role of biosolid colloids as
contaminant carriers and the significant risk they pose, if unaccounted, for
soil and ground water contamination in areas receiving heavy applications of
biosolid waste amendments.
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1153-1164 (2005)
Posted Aug 5, 2005
http://www.rednova.com/modules/news/tools.php?tool=print&id=199188
"A High-Level Disinfection Standard for Land Applying Sewage Sludges (Biosolids)",
David K. Gattie and David L. Lewis, Environ Health Perspect, February 2004
Abstract: Complaints associated with
land-applied sewage sludges primarily involve irritation of the skin, mucous
membranes, and the respiratory tract accompanied by opportunistic infections.
Volatile emissions and organic dusts appear to be the main source of irritation.
Occasionally, chronic gastrointestinal problems are reported by affected
residents who have private wells. To prevent acute health effects, we recommend
that the current system of classifying sludges based on indicator pathogen
levels (Class A and Class B) be replaced with a single high-level disinfection
standard and that methods used to treat sludges be improved to reduce levels of
irritant chemicals, especially endotoxins. A national opinion survey of
individuals impacted by or concerned about the safety of land-application
practices indicated that most did not consider the practice inherently unsafe
but that they lacked confidence in research supported by federal and state
agencies. Key words: biosolids, sewage sludge. Environ Health Perspect 112:126–131
(2004). doi:10.1289/ehp.6207 available via http://dx.doi.org/.
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2003/6207/6207.pdf
"Considerations for Dairy Farms Regarding Use of Sewage Sludges,
Sludge Products and Septage",
Cornell Waste Management Institute, Nov
2003.
http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/Sludge/Dairysludgesummary.pdf 6 page summary
http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/Sludge/Dairysludge.pdf 23-page report
"This document is intended to help dairy farmers and their advisors make
informed decisions regarding the use of sewage sludges, sludge-based products
and septage and to outline measures that can reduce the risks that may be
associated with application on dairy farms."
"A High-Level Disinfection Standard for Land Applying Sewage Sludges
(Biosolids)" David K. Gattie and David L. Lewis, Environmental health
Perspectives, November 2003. (click here)
"Interactions of pathogens and irritant chemicals in land-applied sewage sludges
(biosolids)" David L Lewis, David K Gattie, Marc E Novak, Susan Sanchez and Charles
Pumphrey
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/2/11/qc
Dr. Rob Hale: Summary of February 20, 2002 Presentation. (click here)
CDC's NIOSH (National Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health) July 2002 Guidance for Controlling Potential
Risks to Workers Exposed to Class B Sludge:
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-149/2002-149.html
Nicholls,Henry, 2003
Bacteria learn antibiotic resistance in the sludge, Drug Discovery Today,
Volume 8, Issue 22, 15 November 2003, Page 1011
http://www.vetscite.org/publish/items/001512/
Ellen Z. Harrison, Murray B. McBride and David R. Bouldin, 1999
Land Application of Sewage Sludges: An Appraisal of the US Regulations.
http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/PDFS/LandApp.pdf
Hale, R.C. and M.J. La Guardia, 2002
Have risks associated with the presence of synthetic
organic contaminants in land-applied sewage sludges
been adequately assessed? New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational
Health Policy, 12(4) 371-386.
Hale, R.C., M.J. La Guardia, E. Harvey and **T.M. Mainor, 2002
The potential role of fire retardant-treated polyurethane foam as a source of
brominated diphenyl ethers to the US environment. Chemosphere 46:729-735.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00456535
McBride, M. B., 2002
Toxic metals in sewage sludge-amended soils: has promotion of
beneficial use discounted the risks? Advances in Environmental Research (in publication)
(click here)
M.J. LaGuardia, R.C. Hale, E. Harvey and **T.M. Mainor, 2001
Alkylphenol ethoxylate degradation products in land applied sewage sludges (biosolids).
Env. Sci.Technol. 35:4798-4804.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11775155&dopt=Abstract
http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/doilookup?in_doi=10.1021/es0109040
Hale, R.C., M.J. La Guardia, E.P. Harvey, **T.M. Mainor, W.H. Duff, *M.O. Gaylor,
2001
Polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in
Virginia freshwater fishes (USA). Env. Sci. Technol.
35:4585-4591.
http://pubs3.acs.org/acs/journals/doilookup?in_doi=10.1021/es010845q
Hale, R.C., M.J. LaGuardia, E. Harvey, *M.O. Gaylor, T.M. Mainor and *W.H.
Duff, 2001
Flame retardants:Persistent pollutants in land-applied sludges. Nature 412:141-2.
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v412/n6843/abs/412140a0_fs.html
"Sample Questions and Answers", prepared by Dr. Margolin for
a Shenandoah County Committee investigating sludge. (click here)
David L. Lewis, David K Gattie, 2002
Pathogen Risks from Applying Sewage Sludge to Land, Environ. Sci. Tech. 2002
36(13): 286A-293A
http://pubs.acs.org/journals/esthag/index_magazine.html
(Available free through August, 2002)
|